Skip to main content

Table 1 Topics discussed with CN personnel at feedback meetings and considered in satisfaction questionnaire.

From: Formative evaluation of a telemedicine model for delivering clinical neurophysiology services part I: Utility, technical performance and service provider perspective

For technologists:
Referral details
   1. Were all sections of the EEG referral form complete?
EEG recording
   2. Did you have any problems with the EEG recording equipment?
2a. Describe the nature of any problem encountered.
EEG file transfer
   3. Did you transfer EEG files to file server storage?
3a. Did you experience any difficulties with file transfer?
3b. Describe the nature of any difficulty experienced.
General comments
   4. Please provide any other comments about the teleneurophysiology recording session.
For the consultant.:
Referral details
   1. Was all referral information available for the EEG reporting session
1a. Were all sections of the referral form complete?
1b. On a scale of 1 - 5 how appropriate do you think the referral is? (1 = referral was not appropriate for EEG investigation; 5 = referral was highly appropriate for EEG investigation
EEG file access
   2. Was the EEG file accessible from the Beaumont EEG review station?
2a. Did you experience any difficulty in accessing required EEG files?
2b. Describe the nature of any difficulty encountered.
EEG reporting
   3. How long did EEG reporting take - from accessing the EEG file to closing the EEG file?
3a. Did you encounter any problems with the EEG review equipment?
3b. Describe the nature of any difficulty encountered.
3c. On a scale of 1 - 5 please rate the quality of EEG recordings (1 = poor quality; 5 = excellent quality).
General comments
   4. Please provide any other comments about the teleneurophysiology reporting session.