Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Sixteen years of ICPC use in Norwegian primary care: looking through the facts

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 Jun 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
2 Jul 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jürgen Stausberg
7 Jul 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Petra Knaup
4 Aug 2009 Author responded Author comments - Taxiarchis Botsis
Resubmission - Version 2
4 Aug 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 Aug 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jürgen Stausberg
26 Aug 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Petra Knaup
24 Sep 2009 Author responded Author comments - Taxiarchis Botsis
Resubmission - Version 3
24 Sep 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
30 Oct 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jürgen Stausberg
14 Dec 2009 Author responded Author comments - Taxiarchis Botsis
Resubmission - Version 4
14 Dec 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
19 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - Taxiarchis Botsis
Resubmission - Version 5
19 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
23 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - Taxiarchis Botsis
Resubmission - Version 7
23 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
24 Feb 2010 Editorially accepted
24 Feb 2010 Article published 10.1186/1472-6947-10-11

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement