Research article
Open Access
Open Peer Review
Clinical outcomes resulting from telemedicine interventions: a systematic review
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making20011:5
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-1-5
© Hersh et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2001
Received: 23 October 2001
Accepted: 26 November 2001
Published: 26 November 2001
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 23 Oct 2001 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 31 Oct 2001 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bonnie Wakefield |
| 8 Nov 2001 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter Yellowlees |
| 18 Nov 2001 | Author responded | Author comments - William Hersh |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18 Nov 2001 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| Publishing | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 Nov 2001 | Editorially accepted | |
| 26 Nov 2001 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6947-1-5 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
Authors’ Affiliations
(1)
Division of Medical Informatics & Outcomes Research, Oregon Health & Science University, BICC
(2)
School of Nursing, Oregon Health & Science University. BICC
(3)
Department of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, BICC
(4)
Evidence-Based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University, BICC
