Table 5 Merged qualitative and quantitative results, leading to feasibility evaluation and comments
Feasibility | Data type | Feasibility criteria | Results | Whether feasibility criterion was met | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Process | |||||
Recruitment potential | Quantitative and qualitative | 30% of eligible youth expected to participate | 26% of eligible youth participated | YES Recruitment was near target (30%) | |
Resources | |||||
Study administration | Qualitative | When using the Information Technology platform (IT-platform), is the education material understandable and the study procedure manageable, from the perspective of healthcare professionals’ time and effort? | The educational live sessions made it easier and reminding videos and written instructions good | YES The education material was helpful | Discuss YHC work planning, to ensure time for the health assessment conversation |
IT-platform accessibility | Qualitative | Is working with the IT-platform acceptable? Were there any technical problems obstructing its use? If so, what? | Using the IT-platform was quick and simple No technical problems were reported | YES | Developing routines was recommended |
Management | |||||
Data accessibility | Qualitative | Was accessing the case report and action registration form in the IT-platform acceptable? | The case report histograms were not found and used by everyone | YES The text answers also provided needed information | Contact the healthcare professionals with reminders and provide support |
Case report interpretation | Qualitative | Was the healthcare professionals’ interpretation of the case report satisfactory? | The case report revealed new information and was easily understood | YES Text answers added detailed histogram information | |
Scientific | |||||
Data variance | Qualitative | Were there any ceiling or floor effects? Was data variance acceptable? | No ceiling or floor effects were detected | YES Descriptive statistics showed acceptable data variance | |
Missing items | Was the number of missing items acceptable? | Items missing from 4 of 6 instruments: SWEMWBS (1); IPAQ (8); Sexual Health Self-efficacy (3); SOMS-7 (14) | YES The number of missing items was acceptable at < 5% |