Evaluation of record linkage of two large administrative databases in a middle income country: stillbirths and notifications of dengue during pregnancy in Brazil
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 10 April 2017
Accepted: 10 July 2017
Published: 17 July 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|10 Apr 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|30 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Matthew Sperrin|
|23 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Luís Velez Lapão|
|16 Jun 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Enny Paixao|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|16 Jun 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|19 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Matthew Sperrin|
|3 Jul 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Enny Paixao|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|3 Jul 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|10 Jul 2017||Editorially accepted|
|17 Jul 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12911-017-0506-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.