Skip to main content

Table 10 Summary of findings regarding Hypotheses

From: Electronic Health Record Portal Adoption: a cross country analysis

Path

Beta

t-value

Hypothesis

Result

PE → BI

0.285

6.61**

H1

supported

EE → BI

0.160

3.17**

H2

supported

SI → BI

0.198

5.42**

H3

supported

FC → BI

0.062

1.51

H4(a)

not supported

FC → UB

0.052

1.19

H4(b)

not supported

HM → BI

−0.141

3.63**

H5

supported

PV → BI

0.152

3.62**

H6(a)

supported

(PVUS → BIUS) - (PVPT → BIPT)

0.200

2.46*

H6(b)

supported

HT → BI

0.255

6.74**

H7(a)

supported

HT → UB

0.145

2.96**

H7(b)

supported

BI→ UB

0.480

10.57**

H8

supported

CL→ UB

0.088

1.49

H9(a)

not supported

(CLUS → UBUS) - (CLPT → UBPT)

−0.046

0.56

H9(b)

not supported

ER→ UB

−0.018

0.36

H10(a)

not supported

(ERUS → UBUS) - (ERPT → UBPT)

0.289

2.50*

H10(b)

not supported

UA→ UB

−0.098

1.47

H11(a)

not supported

(UAUS → UBUS) - (UAPT → UBPT)

0.149

1.03

H11(b)

not supported

SU→ UB

0.000

0.00

H12(a)

not supported

(SUUS → UBUS) - (SUPT → UBPT)

−0.025

0.22

H12(b)

not supported

  1. PE: Performance expectancy, EE: Effort expectancy, SI: Social influence, FC: Facilitating conditions, HM: Hedonic motivation, PV: Price value, HT: Habit, BI: Behavioural intention, CL: Collection, ER: Errors, UA: Unauthorized access, SU: Secondary use, UB: Use behaviour
  2. ** = P < 0.01; * = P < 0.05