Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Constructive eHealth evaluation: lessons from evaluation of EHR development in 4 Danish hospitals

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision MakingBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:45

DOI: 10.1186/s12911-017-0444-2

Received: 22 December 2016

Accepted: 11 April 2017

Published: 20 April 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
22 Dec 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
31 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ross Koppel
31 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rupa S. Valdez
27 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Anna Marie Balling Høstgaard
Resubmission - Version 2
27 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
7 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Anna Marie Balling Høstgaard
Resubmission - Version 3
7 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
11 Apr 2017 Editorially accepted
20 Apr 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12911-017-0444-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University
(2)
Department of Planning, Danish Centre for Health Informatics, Aalborg University

Advertisement