Publication trends in the medical informatics literature: 20 years of "Medical Informatics" in MeSH
© DeShazo et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 03 July 2008
Accepted: 21 January 2009
Published: 21 January 2009
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|3 Jul 2008||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|4 Aug 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Francisco López-Muñoz|
|26 Aug 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Titus Schleyer|
|25 Sep 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - John Holmes|
|14 Nov 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Jonathan DeShazo|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|14 Nov 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|4 Dec 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Titus Schleyer|
|21 Dec 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Jonathan DeShazo|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|21 Dec 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|5 Jan 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Jonathan DeShazo|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|5 Jan 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|21 Jan 2009||Editorially accepted|
|21 Jan 2009||Article published||10.1186/1472-6947-9-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.