Underutilization of information and knowledge in everyday medical practice: Evaluation of a computer-based solution
© Zakim et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 18 July 2008
Accepted: 05 November 2008
Published: 05 November 2008
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|18 Jul 2008||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|19 Aug 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - James Cimino|
|22 Aug 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Padmanabhan Ramnarayan|
|11 Sep 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - henriette moll|
|12 Sep 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rebecca Jerome|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|9 Oct 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - henriette moll|
|21 Oct 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rebecca Jerome|
|22 Oct 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Padmanabhan Ramnarayan|
|26 Oct 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Mark Dominik Alscher|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|26 Oct 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|29 Oct 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Mark Dominik Alscher|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|29 Oct 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|5 Nov 2008||Editorially accepted|
|5 Nov 2008||Article published||10.1186/1472-6947-8-50|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.