Skip to main content

Table 2 Preferred test choice without and with out-of-pocket costs

From: The effect of offering different numbers of colorectal cancer screening test options in a decision aid: a pilot randomized trial

Test Type

5-Option Version (n = 25)

2-Option Version (n = 37)

 

Without OPC

With OPC*

Without OPC

With OPC**

FOBT

21%

17%

32%

54%

Sigmoidoscopy

4%

8%

-

-

FOBT & Sigmoidoscopy

21%

21%

-

-

Colonoscopy

46%

42%

68%

41%

Barium Enema

4%

8%

-

-

No Screening

4%

4%

-

5%

  1. * Proportion of participants choosing colonoscopy with and without out-of-pocket costs for those viewing the 5-option version (p = 0.31 McNemar's test)
  2. ** Proportion of participants choosing colonoscopy based on out-of-pocket costs for the 2-option version (p = 0.0016)
  3. † Proportion participants selecting colonoscopy between groups without out-of-pocket costs (χ2 p = 0.11)
  4. †† Proportion participants selecting colonoscopy between groups with out-of-pocket costs (χ2 p = 1.00)
Back to article page

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

ISSN: 1472-6947

Contact us