Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

User experiences of evidence-based online resources for health professionals: User testing of The Cochrane Library

  • Sarah E Rosenbaum1Email author,
  • Claire Glenton1 and
  • Jane Cracknell2
Contributed equally
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making20088:34

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-8-34

Received: 22 April 2008

Accepted: 28 July 2008

Published: 28 July 2008

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
22 Apr 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
13 May 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul Taylor
16 May 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Farah Magrabi
1 Jun 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jose Arocha
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
23 Jun 2008 Author responded Author comments - Sarah Rosenbaum
Resubmission - Version 7
23 Jun 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 7
7 Jul 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Farah Magrabi
7 Jul 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jose Arocha
15 Jul 2008 Author responded Author comments - Sarah Rosenbaum
Resubmission - Version 8
15 Jul 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 8
21 Jul 2008 Author responded Author comments - Sarah Rosenbaum
Resubmission - Version 9
21 Jul 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 9
Publishing
28 Jul 2008 Editorially accepted
28 Jul 2008 Article published 10.1186/1472-6947-8-34

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services
(2)
Rigshospitalet, Dep. 33-4-52

Advertisement