No paper, but the same routines: a qualitative exploration of experiences in two Norwegian hospitals deprived of the paper based medical record
© Lium et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 02 May 2007
Accepted: 10 January 2008
Published: 10 January 2008
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|2 May 2007||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|6 Jun 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dean Sittig|
|10 Jun 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - henriette moll|
|19 Jul 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Jan Tore Lium|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|19 Jul 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|8 Aug 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Jan Tore Lium|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|8 Aug 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|18 Sep 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - henriette moll|
|6 Dec 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dean Sittig|
|5 Jan 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Jan Tore Lium|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|5 Jan 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|10 Jan 2008||Editorially accepted|
|10 Jan 2008||Article published||10.1186/1472-6947-8-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.