The interpretation of systematic reviews with meta-analyses: an objective or subjective process?
© Shrier et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 16 October 2007
Accepted: 21 May 2008
Published: 21 May 2008
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|16 Oct 2007||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|16 Nov 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alex Sutton|
|23 Nov 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Malinee Laopaiboon|
|24 Nov 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tom Trikalinos|
|21 Dec 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Ian Shrier|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|21 Dec 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|14 Feb 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tom Trikalinos|
|18 Mar 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alex Sutton|
|27 Mar 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Ian Shrier|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|27 Mar 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|13 May 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Ian Shrier|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|13 May 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|19 May 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Ian Shrier|
|Resubmission - Version 7|
|19 May 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 7|
|21 May 2008||Editorially accepted|
|21 May 2008||Article published||10.1186/1472-6947-8-19|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.