Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Script Concordance Tests: Guidelines for Construction

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making20088:18

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-8-18

Received: 28 November 2007

Accepted: 06 May 2008

Published: 06 May 2008

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
28 Nov 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 Nov 2007 Author responded Author comments - Bernard Charlin
Resubmission - Version 3
28 Nov 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Jan 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Charles Sneiderman
4 Jan 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Clarence Kreiter
18 Feb 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jose Arocha
17 Mar 2008 Author responded Author comments - Bernard Charlin
Resubmission - Version 4
17 Mar 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
1 Apr 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Clarence Kreiter
16 Apr 2008 Author responded Author comments - Bernard Charlin
Resubmission - Version 5
16 Apr 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 5
24 Apr 2008 Author responded Author comments - Bernard Charlin
Resubmission - Version 6
24 Apr 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 6
28 Apr 2008 Author responded Author comments - Bernard Charlin
Resubmission - Version 7
28 Apr 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
6 May 2008 Editorially accepted
6 May 2008 Article published 10.1186/1472-6947-8-18

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Département de Pédagogie Médicale, Faculté de Médecine de Nice Sophia Antipolis
(2)
École Régionale de Sages-femmes, Faculté de Médecine de Marseille
(3)
CPASS, direction de la recherche, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal

Advertisement