Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Should a colon cancer screening decision aid include the option of no testing? A comparative trial of two decision aids

  • Jennifer M Griffith1Email author,
  • Marlie Fichter2,
  • Floyd J Fowler2,
  • Carmen Lewis1, 3 and
  • Michael P Pignone1, 3
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making20088:10

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-8-10

Received: 16 May 2007

Accepted: 05 March 2008

Published: 05 March 2008

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
16 May 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Jul 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul Taylor
26 Jul 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anna Gagliardi
31 Jul 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Melissa Partin
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
17 Oct 2007 Author responded Author comments - Jennifer Griffith
Resubmission - Version 4
17 Oct 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 4
26 Oct 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Melissa Partin
7 Nov 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul Taylor
3 Dec 2007 Author responded Author comments - Jennifer Griffith
Resubmission - Version 5
3 Dec 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 5
3 Dec 2007 Author responded Author comments - Jennifer Griffith
Resubmission - Version 6
3 Dec 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 6
18 Dec 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Melissa Partin
25 Jan 2008 Author responded Author comments - Jennifer Griffith
Resubmission - Version 7
25 Jan 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 7
25 Feb 2008 Author responded Author comments - Jennifer Griffith
Resubmission - Version 8
25 Feb 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
5 Mar 2008 Editorially accepted
5 Mar 2008 Article published 10.1186/1472-6947-8-10

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Center for Decision Making Research, Cecil Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill
(2)
Foundation for Informed Medical Decision Making
(3)
Division of General Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina- Chapel Hill

Advertisement