A simulation study comparing aberration detection algorithms for syndromic surveillance
© Jackson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 06 December 2006
Accepted: 01 March 2007
Published: 01 March 2007
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|6 Dec 2006||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|1 Jan 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Howard Burkom|
|8 Jan 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Richard Heffernan|
|10 Jan 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Stoto|
|13 Feb 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Michael Jackson|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|13 Feb 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|23 Feb 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Michael Jackson|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|23 Feb 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|1 Mar 2007||Editorially accepted|
|1 Mar 2007||Article published||10.1186/1472-6947-7-6|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.