The effect of attitude to risk on decisions made by nurses using computerised decision support software in telephone clinical assessment: an observational study
© O'Cathain et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 20 April 2007
Accepted: 29 November 2007
Published: 29 November 2007
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|20 Apr 2007||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|6 Jun 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marie-Pascale Pomey|
|19 Aug 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Steve George|
|25 Sep 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Alicia O'Cathain|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|25 Sep 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|9 Nov 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marie-Pascale Pomey|
|27 Nov 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Alicia O'Cathain|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|27 Nov 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|29 Nov 2007||Editorially accepted|
|29 Nov 2007||Article published||10.1186/1472-6947-7-39|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.