A web-based laboratory information system to improve quality of care of tuberculosis patients in Peru: functional requirements, implementation and usage statistics
© Blaya et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 25 June 2007
Accepted: 28 October 2007
Published: 28 October 2007
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|25 Jun 2007||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 Jul 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Terry John Hannan|
|22 Aug 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Thomas Shinnick|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|19 Sep 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Joaquin Blaya|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|19 Sep 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|26 Oct 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Joaquin Blaya|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|26 Oct 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|28 Oct 2007||Editorially accepted|
|28 Oct 2007||Article published||10.1186/1472-6947-7-33|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.