A survey of factors affecting clinician acceptance of clinical decision support
© Sittig et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
Received: 09 June 2005
Accepted: 01 February 2006
Published: 01 February 2006
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|9 Jun 2005||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|8 Jul 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gil Kuperman|
|18 Aug 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Madhukar Trivedi|
|30 Aug 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Dean Sittig|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|30 Aug 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|13 Sep 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gil Kuperman|
|6 Dec 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Bates|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|23 Jan 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Dean Sittig|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|23 Jan 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|1 Feb 2006||Editorially accepted|
|1 Feb 2006||Article published||10.1186/1472-6947-6-6|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.