House officer procedure documentation using a personal digital assistant: a longitudinal study
© Bird and Lane; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
Received: 13 July 2005
Accepted: 26 January 2006
Published: 26 January 2006
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|13 Jul 2005||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|10 Oct 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Polun Chang|
|10 Oct 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Scott Strayer|
|25 Oct 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Steven Bird|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|25 Oct 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|16 Nov 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Scott Strayer|
|30 Nov 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Polun Chang|
|8 Dec 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Steven Bird|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|8 Dec 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|26 Jan 2006||Editorially accepted|
|26 Jan 2006||Article published||10.1186/1472-6947-6-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.