Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Evidence for handheld electronic medical records in improving care: a systematic review

Contributed equally
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making20066:26

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-6-26

Received: 22 March 2006

Accepted: 20 June 2006

Published: 20 June 2006

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
22 Mar 2006 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 Apr 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jonathan Handler
8 May 2006 Author responded Author comments - Robert Wu
8 May 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dirk Stengel
Resubmission - Version 3
8 May 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 3
2 Jun 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jonathan Handler
12 Jun 2006 Author responded Author comments - Robert Wu
Resubmission - Version 4
12 Jun 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 4
15 Jun 2006 Author responded Author comments - Robert Wu
Resubmission - Version 5
15 Jun 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
20 Jun 2006 Editorially accepted
20 Jun 2006 Article published 10.1186/1472-6947-6-26

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of General Internal Medicine, University Health Network
(2)
Knowledge Translation Program, University of Toronto

Advertisement