Evidence for handheld electronic medical records in improving care: a systematic review
© Wu and Straus; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
Received: 22 March 2006
Accepted: 20 June 2006
Published: 20 June 2006
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|22 Mar 2006||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|23 Apr 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jonathan Handler|
|8 May 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Robert Wu|
|8 May 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dirk Stengel|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|8 May 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|2 Jun 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jonathan Handler|
|12 Jun 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Robert Wu|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|12 Jun 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|15 Jun 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Robert Wu|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|15 Jun 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|20 Jun 2006||Editorially accepted|
|20 Jun 2006||Article published||10.1186/1472-6947-6-26|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.