A review of randomized controlled trials comparing the effectiveness of hand held computers with paper methods for data collection
© Lane et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
Received: 21 June 2005
Accepted: 31 May 2006
Published: 31 May 2006
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|21 Jun 2005||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|3 Jul 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dirk Stengel|
|10 Jul 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jochen Moehr|
|18 Jul 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Robert Jamison|
|19 Jul 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stephen E. Lapinsky|
|19 Jul 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Arthur Stone|
|7 Oct 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Shannon Lane|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|7 Oct 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|1 Dec 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jochen Moehr|
|3 Mar 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Petra Knaup|
|1 Apr 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Shannon Lane|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|1 Apr 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|18 Apr 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Petra Knaup|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|30 May 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Shannon Lane|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|30 May 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|31 May 2006||Editorially accepted|
|31 May 2006||Article published||10.1186/1472-6947-6-23|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.