A web-based library consult service for evidence-based medicine: Technical development
© Schwartz et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
Received: 26 January 2006
Accepted: 16 March 2006
Published: 16 March 2006
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|26 Jan 2006||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|15 Feb 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ann McKibbon|
|23 Feb 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Ackerman|
|24 Feb 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Alan Schwartz|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|24 Feb 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|27 Feb 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ann McKibbon|
|10 Mar 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Alan Schwartz|
|10 Mar 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Ackerman|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|10 Mar 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|14 Mar 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Alan Schwartz|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|14 Mar 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|16 Mar 2006||Editorially accepted|
|16 Mar 2006||Article published||10.1186/1472-6947-6-16|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.