Feasibility of a patient decision aid regarding disclosure of personal health information: qualitative evaluation of the Health Care Information Directive
© Tracy et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2004
Received: 27 April 2004
Accepted: 10 September 2004
Published: 10 September 2004
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|27 Apr 2004||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|4 May 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kenneth Mandl|
|12 May 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Barbara Yawn|
|20 May 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Robling|
|23 Jun 2004||Author responded||Author comments - Ross Upshur|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|23 Jun 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|6 Jul 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Robling|
|19 Jul 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Barbara Yawn|
|20 Jul 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kenneth Mandl|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|27 Aug 2004||Author responded||Author comments - Ross Upshur|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|27 Aug 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|9 Sep 2004||Author responded||Author comments - Ross Upshur|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|9 Sep 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|10 Sep 2004||Editorially accepted|
|10 Sep 2004||Article published||10.1186/1472-6947-4-13|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.