The feasibility of using pattern recognition software to measure the influence of computer use on the consultation
© de Lusignan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2003
Received: 02 September 2003
Accepted: 26 November 2003
Published: 26 November 2003
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|2 Sep 2003||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|29 Sep 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Elske Ammenwerth|
|9 Oct 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Frank Sullivan|
|24 Oct 2003||Author responded||Author comments - alice theadom|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|24 Oct 2003||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|28 Oct 2003||Author responded||Author comments - alice theadom|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|28 Oct 2003||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|14 Nov 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Elske Ammenwerth|
|23 Nov 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Frank Sullivan|
|25 Nov 2003||Author responded||Author comments - alice theadom|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|25 Nov 2003||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|26 Nov 2003||Editorially accepted|
|26 Nov 2003||Article published||10.1186/1472-6947-3-12|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.