Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Results of a content analysis of electronic messages (email) sent between patients and their physicians

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making20033:11

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-3-11

Received: 20 March 2003

Accepted: 01 October 2003

Published: 01 October 2003

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
20 Mar 2003 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Apr 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Cynthia Baur
22 May 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Myriam Deveugele
14 Aug 2003 Author responded Author comments - Dean Sittig
Resubmission - Version 3
14 Aug 2003 Submitted Manuscript version 3
4 Sep 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Cynthia Baur
16 Sep 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Myriam Deveugele
26 Sep 2003 Author responded Author comments - Dean Sittig
Resubmission - Version 4
26 Sep 2003 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
1 Oct 2003 Editorially accepted
1 Oct 2003 Article published 10.1186/1472-6947-3-11

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Clinical Informatics Research Network, Kaiser Permanente

Advertisement