Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Medical informatics in an undergraduate curriculum: a qualitative study

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making20022:6

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-2-6

Received: 27 May 2002

Accepted: 3 September 2002

Published: 3 September 2002

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
27 May 2002 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Jun 2002 Reviewed Reviewer Report - S Andrew Spooner
24 Jun 2002 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jochen Moehr
10 Jul 2002 Author responded Author comments - Vivek Goel
Resubmission - Version 3
10 Jul 2002 Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Sep 2002 Editorially accepted
3 Sep 2002 Article published 10.1186/1472-6947-2-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Community Medicine Residency Program, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto
Stanford Medical Informatics, Stanford University, School of Medicine Medical School Office Building
Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto Simcoe Hall