The clinical adoption meta-model: a temporal meta-model describing the clinical adoption of health information systems
© Price and Lau; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 19 June 2013
Accepted: 21 May 2014
Published: 29 May 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|19 Jun 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|27 Jun 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Morgan Price|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|27 Jun 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|10 Apr 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Manolis Tsiknakis|
|10 Apr 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Werner O Hackl|
|12 May 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Morgan Price|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|12 May 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|15 May 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Morgan Price|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|15 May 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|21 May 2014||Editorially accepted|
|29 May 2014||Article published||10.1186/1472-6947-14-43|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.