Strengthening district-based health reporting through the district health management information software system: the Ugandan experience
© Kiberu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 29 November 2013
Accepted: 6 May 2014
Published: 13 May 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|29 Nov 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|5 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Terry John Hannan|
|27 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Zach Landis-Lewis|
|1 Feb 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joaquin Blaya|
|8 Mar 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Vincent Micheal Kiberu|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|8 Mar 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|31 Mar 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Terry John Hannan|
|4 Apr 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Zach Landis-Lewis|
|6 Apr 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joaquin Blaya|
|30 Apr 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Vincent Micheal Kiberu|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|30 Apr 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|6 May 2014||Editorially accepted|
|13 May 2014||Article published||10.1186/1472-6947-14-40|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.