A cross-sectional survey assessing the acceptability and feasibility of self-report electronic data collection about health risks from patients attending an Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Service
© Noble et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 2 July 2013
Accepted: 11 April 2014
Published: 16 April 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|2 Jul 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|30 Oct 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Shaouli Shahid|
|4 Mar 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Judith Katzenellenbogen|
|17 Mar 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Natasha Noble|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|17 Mar 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|30 Mar 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Judith Katzenellenbogen|
|6 Apr 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Natasha Noble|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|6 Apr 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|11 Apr 2014||Editorially accepted|
|16 Apr 2014||Article published||10.1186/1472-6947-14-34|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.