Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Accessing the public MIMIC-II intensive care relational database for clinical research

  • Daniel J Scott1,
  • Joon Lee1, 2Email author,
  • Ikaro Silva1,
  • Shinhyuk Park1,
  • George B Moody1,
  • Leo A Celi1 and
  • Roger G Mark1
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making201313:9

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-9

Received: 15 August 2012

Accepted: 31 December 2012

Published: 10 January 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
15 Aug 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
11 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dina Demner-Fushman
13 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Daby Sow
19 Nov 2012 Author responded Author comments - Joon Lee
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Nov 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Daby Sow
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
31 Dec 2012 Editorially accepted
10 Jan 2013 Article published 10.1186/1472-6947-13-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology
School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo