Ancillary study management systems: a review of needs
© Nelson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 15 March 2012
Accepted: 28 December 2012
Published: 7 January 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|15 Mar 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|11 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Philip Payne|
|20 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - meredith nahm|
|23 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Wenle Zhao|
|25 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Greg Fegan|
|22 Oct 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Elizabeth Nelson|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|22 Oct 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|1 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Philip Payne|
|19 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Wenle Zhao|
|21 Dec 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Elizabeth Nelson|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|21 Dec 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|28 Dec 2012||Editorially accepted|
|7 Jan 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6947-13-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.