Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Video observation in HIT development: lessons learned on benefits and challenges

Contributed equally
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making201212:91

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-91

Received: 23 March 2012

Accepted: 23 July 2012

Published: 22 August 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
23 Mar 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 May 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Pirkko Nykänen
21 May 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Vivian Vimarlund
27 Jun 2012 Author responded Author comments - Anna Marie Balling Høstgaard
Resubmission - Version 3
27 Jun 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
11 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Vivian Vimarlund
17 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Pirkko Nykänen
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
23 Jul 2012 Editorially accepted
22 Aug 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6947-12-91

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Development and Planning, Virtual Centre of Health Informatics, Aalborg University

Advertisement