Advancing clinical decision support using lessons from outside of healthcare: an interdisciplinary systematic review
© Wu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 1 December 2011
Accepted: 12 July 2012
Published: 17 August 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|1 Dec 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|10 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joan Ash|
|7 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jos Aarts|
|15 Jun 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Helen Wu|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|15 Jun 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|5 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joan Ash|
|10 Jul 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Helen Wu|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|10 Jul 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|12 Jul 2012||Editorially accepted|
|17 Aug 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6947-12-90|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.