Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Advancing clinical decision support using lessons from outside of healthcare: an interdisciplinary systematic review

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making201212:90

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-90

Received: 1 December 2011

Accepted: 12 July 2012

Published: 17 August 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Dec 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joan Ash
7 May 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jos Aarts
15 Jun 2012 Author responded Author comments - Helen Wu
Resubmission - Version 3
15 Jun 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
5 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joan Ash
10 Jul 2012 Author responded Author comments - Helen Wu
Resubmission - Version 4
10 Jul 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
12 Jul 2012 Editorially accepted
17 Aug 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6947-12-90

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
RAND Corporation and Pardee RAND Graduate School
(2)
David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California

Advertisement