Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Estimating the re-identification risk of clinical data sets

  • Fida Kamal Dankar1,
  • Khaled El Emam1, 2, 4Email author,
  • Angelica Neisa1 and
  • Tyson Roffey3
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making201212:66

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-66

Received: 5 December 2011

Accepted: 18 June 2012

Published: 9 July 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
5 Dec 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
25 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joshua Tebbs
13 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - krishna saha
28 May 2012 Author responded Author comments - Khaled El Emam
Resubmission - Version 2
28 May 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - krishna saha
11 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joshua Tebbs
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
18 Jun 2012 Editorially accepted
9 Jul 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6947-12-66

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute
(2)
Pediatrics, University of Ottawa
(3)
Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario
(4)
CHEO Research Institute

Advertisement