Skip to main content

Table 4 Confirmatory factor analyses of the 3–factor prostate cancer screening anxiety model by clinic site

From: Is a prostate cancer screening anxiety measure invariant across two different samples of age-appropriate men?

Model

Chi–square (df)

P–value

CFI

TLI

RMSEA

WRMR

Private Clinic

3-Content

178.932 (38)

<.001

.921

.960

.112

1.369

3-Content + 6-Method

50.999 (36)

.050

.992

.996

.038

.543

Public Clinic

3-Content

71.563 (31)

<.001

.967

.985

.095

.884

3-Content + 6-Method

26.565 (29)

.595

1.000

1.001

<.001

.420

  1. Note. Content = hypothesized subscales; Method = similarly worded items; CFI = comparative fit index; TLI = Tucker–Lewis index; RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation; WRMR = weighted root mean square residual; bold font indicates adequate fit.
Back to article page

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

ISSN: 1472-6947

Contact us