Is a prostate cancer screening anxiety measure invariant across two different samples of age-appropriate men?
© Linder et al.; Licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 12 October 2010
Accepted: 8 June 2012
Published: 8 June 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|12 Oct 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|23 Dec 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Wolfgang Linden|
|20 Jan 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Christie|
|2 May 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Suzanne Linder|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|2 May 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|8 Jun 2012||Editorially accepted|
|8 Jun 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6947-12-52|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.