Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Measuring decision quality: psychometric evaluation of a new instrument for breast cancer surgery

  • Karen R Sepucha1, 2Email author,
  • Jeffrey K Belkora3,
  • Yuchiao Chang1, 2,
  • Carol Cosenza4,
  • Carrie A Levin5,
  • Beverly Moy6, 2,
  • Ann Partridge7, 2 and
  • Clara N Lee8
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making201212:51

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-51

Received: 10 October 2011

Accepted: 21 May 2012

Published: 8 June 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 Oct 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
17 Oct 2011 Author responded Author comments - Karen Sepucha
Resubmission - Version 3
17 Oct 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
7 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Brenda Den Oudsten
16 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jennifer Kryworuchko
20 Mar 2012 Author responded Author comments - Karen Sepucha
Resubmission - Version 4
20 Mar 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
4 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Brenda Den Oudsten
5 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jennifer Kryworuchko
23 Apr 2012 Author responded Author comments - Karen Sepucha
Resubmission - Version 5
23 Apr 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
21 May 2012 Editorially accepted
8 Jun 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6947-12-51

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
General Medicine Division, Massachusetts General Hospital
(2)
Harvard Medical School
(3)
Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California
(4)
Center for Survey Research, University of Massachusetts
(5)
Informed Medical Decision Foundation
(6)
Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center
(7)
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women’s Hospital
(8)
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina

Advertisement