Measuring decision quality: psychometric evaluation of a new instrument for breast cancer surgery
© Sepucha et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 10 October 2011
Accepted: 21 May 2012
Published: 8 June 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|10 Oct 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|17 Oct 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Karen Sepucha|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|17 Oct 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Brenda Den Oudsten|
|16 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jennifer Kryworuchko|
|20 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Karen Sepucha|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|20 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|4 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Brenda Den Oudsten|
|5 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jennifer Kryworuchko|
|23 Apr 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Karen Sepucha|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|23 Apr 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|21 May 2012||Editorially accepted|
|8 Jun 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6947-12-51|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.