Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Assessing accuracy of an electronic provincial medication repository

  • Morgan Price1, 2Email author,
  • Mike Bowen2,
  • Francis Lau2,
  • Nicole Kitson2 and
  • Stan Bardal1
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making201212:42

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-42

Received: 23 November 2011

Accepted: 23 May 2012

Published: 23 May 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
23 Nov 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Dec 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lars Henning Pedersen
8 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Martin Lopez-Nores
16 Mar 2012 Author responded Author comments - Morgan Price
Resubmission - Version 3
16 Mar 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Martin Lopez-Nores
10 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lars Henning Pedersen
20 Apr 2012 Author responded Author comments - Morgan Price
Resubmission - Version 4
20 Apr 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
23 May 2012 Editorially accepted
23 May 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6947-12-42

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
University of British Columbia
(2)
University of Victoria

Advertisement