Willingness to share personal health record data for care improvement and public health: a survey of experienced personal health record users
© Weitzman et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 23 November 2011
Accepted: 22 May 2012
Published: 22 May 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|23 Nov 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|21 Dec 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Eric Ford|
|8 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Helen Bedford|
|26 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Skyler Kelemen|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|26 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|1 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Eric Ford|
|13 Apr 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Skyler Kelemen|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|13 Apr 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|22 May 2012||Editorially accepted|
|22 May 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6947-12-39|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.