The role of ICT in supporting disruptive innovation: a multi-site qualitative study of nurse practitioners in emergency departments
© Li et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 25 October 2011
Accepted: 2 April 2012
Published: 2 April 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|25 Oct 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|16 Dec 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Vivian Vimarlund|
|24 Dec 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ela Klecun|
|23 Feb 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Julie Li|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|23 Feb 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|15 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Vivian Vimarlund|
|15 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ela Klecun|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|2 Apr 2012||Editorially accepted|
|2 Apr 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6947-12-27|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.