Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
13 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
13 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jef Van den Ende |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
13 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
27 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lulu Muhe |
29 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kwame Owusu-Edusei |
12 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gilles Van Cutsem |
15 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jef Van den Ende |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
15 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
25 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kwame Owusu-Edusei |
5 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lulu Muhe |
5 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gilles Van Cutsem |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
13 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Jef Van den Ende |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
13 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
18 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Jef Van den Ende |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
18 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
19 Jan 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
19 Jan 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6947-12-2 |
You can find further information about peer review here.