Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Healthcare professional acceptance of telemonitoring for chronic care patients in primary care

  • José Asua1, 2,
  • Estibalitz Orruño1,
  • Eva Reviriego1 and
  • Marie Pierre Gagnon3, 4Email author
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making201212:139

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-139

Received: 18 July 2012

Accepted: 26 November 2012

Published: 30 November 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
18 Jul 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Cram
23 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ping Yu
27 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Susan Hrisos
30 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Supasit Pannarunothai
31 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Holden
22 Oct 2012 Author responded Author comments - Marie-Pierre Gagnon
Resubmission - Version 3
22 Oct 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
9 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Susan Hrisos
11 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ping Yu
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
26 Nov 2012 Editorially accepted
30 Nov 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6947-12-139

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Health and Consumer Affairs, Basque Government, Office for Health Technology Assessment (Osteba)
(2)
Department of Health and Consumer Affairs, Basque Government, Direction of Knowledge Management and Evaluation
(3)
Faculty of Nursing Sciences, Université Laval
(4)
Research Centre of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec

Advertisement