Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Motivating medical information system performance by system quality, service quality, and job satisfaction for evidence-based practice

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making201212:135

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-135

Received: 18 April 2012

Accepted: 31 October 2012

Published: 21 November 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
18 Apr 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Seiji Bito
15 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jochen Schuld
20 Jul 2012 Author responded Author comments - Ching-Sheng Chang
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Jul 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
21 Jul 2012 Author responded Author comments - Ching-Sheng Chang
Resubmission - Version 4
21 Jul 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
5 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jochen Schuld
11 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Seiji Bito
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
31 Oct 2012 Editorially accepted
21 Nov 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6947-12-135

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
R.O.C Naval academy
(2)
Department of Nursing, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University
(3)
Postgraduate Programs in Management, I-Shou University

Advertisement