Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The quality of Indigenous identification in administrative health data in Australia: insights from studies using data linkage

  • Sandra C Thompson1Email author,
  • John A Woods1 and
  • Judith M Katzenellenbogen1, 2
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making201212:133

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-133

Received: 14 July 2012

Accepted: 8 November 2012

Published: 16 November 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
14 Jul 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
2 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Donna Mak
2 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ian Ring
21 Oct 2012 Author responded Author comments - Sandra Thompson
Resubmission - Version 3
21 Oct 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
8 Nov 2012 Editorially accepted
16 Nov 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6947-12-133

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Combined Universities Centre for Rural Health, University of Western Australia
Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Curtin University