Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Shared decision making for prostate cancer screening: the results of a combined analysis of two practice-based randomized controlled trials

  • Stacey L Sheridan1, 2Email author,
  • Carol Golin1, 2, 3,
  • Audrina Bunton2,
  • John B Lykes2,
  • Bob Schwartz2,
  • Lauren McCormack4,
  • David Driscoll4,
  • Shrikant I Bangdiwala5 and
  • Russell P Harris1, 2
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making201212:130

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-130

Received: 24 April 2012

Accepted: 1 November 2012

Published: 13 November 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
24 Apr 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
4 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert Volk
27 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Steven Zeliadt
23 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Stacey Sheridan
Resubmission - Version 3
23 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Stacey Sheridan
Resubmission - Version 4
23 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
3 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Steven Zeliadt
25 Oct 2012 Author responded Author comments - Stacey Sheridan
Resubmission - Version 5
25 Oct 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
1 Nov 2012 Editorially accepted
13 Nov 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6947-12-130

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina
(2)
Sheps Center for Health Service Research, University of North Carolina
(3)
Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina
(4)
RTI International
(5)
Department of Biostatistics, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina

Advertisement