Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

A study of diverse clinical decision support rule authoring environments and requirements for integration

  • Li Zhou1, 2, 3Email author,
  • Neelima Karipineni1, 3,
  • Janet Lewis1,
  • Saverio M Maviglia1, 2, 3,
  • Amanda Fairbanks1,
  • Tonya Hongsermeier1,
  • Blackford Middleton1, 2, 3 and
  • Roberto A Rocha1, 2, 3
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making201212:128

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-128

Received: 13 June 2012

Accepted: 1 November 2012

Published: 12 November 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
13 Jun 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Jun 2012 Author responded Author comments - Li Zhou
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Jun 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 Jun 2012 Author responded Author comments - Li Zhou
Resubmission - Version 4
20 Jun 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
22 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Beatriz Pérez
29 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jim Warren
29 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Isern
1 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Claudio Eccher
2 Sep 2012 Author responded Author comments - Li Zhou
Resubmission - Version 5
2 Sep 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
2 Sep 2012 Author responded Author comments - Li Zhou
Resubmission - Version 6
2 Sep 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 6
8 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Isern
10 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jim Warren
17 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Beatriz Pérez
17 Oct 2012 Author responded Author comments - Li Zhou
Resubmission - Version 7
17 Oct 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
1 Nov 2012 Editorially accepted
12 Nov 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6947-12-128

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Clinical Informatics Research and Development, Partners HealthCare
(2)
Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women’s Hospital
(3)
Harvard Medical School

Advertisement