Healthcare provider attitudes towards the problem list in an electronic health record: a mixed-methods qualitative study
© Holmes et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 10 March 2012
Accepted: 25 October 2012
Published: 11 November 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|10 Mar 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|17 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bill Galanter|
|26 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Hanauer|
|6 Jul 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Carolyn Holmes|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|6 Jul 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|21 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Hanauer|
|29 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bill Galanter|
|4 Oct 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Carolyn Holmes|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|4 Oct 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|25 Oct 2012||Editorially accepted|
|11 Nov 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6947-12-127|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.