Use of hyperlinks in electronic test result communication: a survey study in general practice
© Mukai et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 12 December 2011
Accepted: 26 September 2012
Published: 4 October 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|12 Dec 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Matheny|
|17 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Peiris|
|13 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Thomas Ostersen Mukai|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|13 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|12 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Peiris|
|13 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Matheny|
|31 Jul 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Thomas Ostersen Mukai|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|31 Jul 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|5 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Matheny|
|23 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Peiris|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|26 Sep 2012||Editorially accepted|
|4 Oct 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6947-12-114|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.