Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Use of hyperlinks in electronic test result communication: a survey study in general practice

  • Thomas Ostersen Mukai1, 2Email author,
  • Flemming Bro1,
  • Morten Fenger-Grøn1, 3,
  • Frede Olesen1 and
  • Peter Vedsted1, 4
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making201212:114

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-114

Received: 12 December 2011

Accepted: 26 September 2012

Published: 4 October 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Dec 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 Jan 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Matheny
17 Jan 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Peiris
13 Mar 2012 Author responded Author comments - Thomas Ostersen Mukai
Resubmission - Version 3
13 Mar 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
12 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Peiris
13 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Matheny
31 Jul 2012 Author responded Author comments - Thomas Ostersen Mukai
Resubmission - Version 4
31 Jul 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
5 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Matheny
23 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Peiris
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
26 Sep 2012 Editorially accepted
4 Oct 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6947-12-114

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
The Research Unit for General Practice, School of Public Health, Aarhus University
(2)
Section for General Medical Practice, School of Public Health, Aarhus University
(3)
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital
(4)
Research Centre for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care – CaP, Aarhus University

Advertisement