Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The effect of clinical experience, judgment task difficulty and time pressure on nurses’ confidence calibration in a high fidelity clinical simulation

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making201212:113

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-113

Received: 2 May 2012

Accepted: 25 September 2012

Published: 3 October 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
2 May 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
4 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Molly McNett
6 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jennifer Mary Weller
21 Jul 2012 Author responded Author comments - Huiqin Yang
Resubmission - Version 3
21 Jul 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
2 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jennifer Mary Weller
10 Sep 2012 Author responded Author comments - Huiqin Yang
Resubmission - Version 4
10 Sep 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
25 Sep 2012 Editorially accepted
3 Oct 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6947-12-113

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York
(2)
Department of Health Sciences, University of York

Advertisement