The effect of clinical experience, judgment task difficulty and time pressure on nurses’ confidence calibration in a high fidelity clinical simulation
© Yang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 2 May 2012
Accepted: 25 September 2012
Published: 3 October 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|2 May 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|4 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Molly McNett|
|6 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jennifer Mary Weller|
|21 Jul 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Huiqin Yang|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|21 Jul 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|2 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jennifer Mary Weller|
|10 Sep 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Huiqin Yang|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|10 Sep 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|25 Sep 2012||Editorially accepted|
|3 Oct 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6947-12-113|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.